<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Business Blog &#187; autodialer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wikijuana.co.uk/tag/autodialer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wikijuana.co.uk</link>
	<description>Blogging about business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 12:52:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What Results To Consider Utilizing Automated Telemarketing To Produce Leads</title>
		<link>http://www.wikijuana.co.uk/2008/10/what-results-to-consider-utilizing-automated-telemarketing-to-produce-leads/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wikijuana.co.uk/2008/10/what-results-to-consider-utilizing-automated-telemarketing-to-produce-leads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 22:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>writer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[autodialer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[call center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lead generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[live transfer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[predictive dialer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telemarketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voice blast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voice broadcasting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wikijuana.co.uk/2008/10/what-results-to-consider-utilizing-automated-telemarketing-to-produce-leads/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A common expectation among new voicemail broadcasters or concerns debating working with pre-recorded telemarketing is that most of their calls will turn out to be good leads.  The majority of the time this is false.  Even so, despite the fact that a minority of responses prove to be qualified leads, voicemail broadcasting can be employed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A common expectation among new voicemail broadcasters or concerns debating working with pre-recorded telemarketing is that most of their calls will turn out to be good leads.  The majority of the time this is false.  Even so, despite the fact that a minority of responses prove to be qualified leads, voicemail broadcasting can be employed fruitfully in many instances, given a deliberate approach and well-grounded business systems.</p>
<p> If a telemarketer is sending a script to live-answered telephones exclusively, and accepting press one live responses to sales staff, we&#8217;ve seen many successful broadcasts that obtain only a 15%-25% &#8220;long call value&#8221;. (Here a long call is specified as a call where both parties are on the phone at the same time for a minimum of 1 1/2 minutes.)  And this is not to mean that every one of the &#8220;long calls&#8221; prove to be classified as good leads by the broadcaster. Far from it. Some broadcasters have revealed that often only 1/2 or sometimes less of the long calls are good leads.</p>
<p> This is why it is essential that a concern debate their business systems deliberately as they plan a voice blasting program. For example, if their average cost for a &#8220;long call&#8221; is $25, and 1/2 of them are worthwhile leads, and they can ultimately sell 1/4 of the good leads, then the cost of a deal for them is $200. If the profit for a single sale is not substantially more than $200, their own business measurements may make it impossible to utilize voice broadcasting profitably.</p>
<p> These numbers will vary radically among different types of businesses, and are affected by both the pitch as well as the target dialing list. For example, the hypothetical business &#8220;Wonderful Web Widgets&#8221;, who desires to sell website services to small business, would be making a mistake to dial a broadcast to an &#8220;all businesses&#8221; list, because such a list would include large concerns (which they&#8217;re not targetting), in addition to a lot of small concerns that dont feel a need to have a website.</p>
<p> Why send a pitch to beauty parlors and accountants if these types of businesses aren&#8217;t normally interested in websites?  This only raises the cost of the reduced amount of qualified leads that are received.</p>
<p> Another thing to consider is the mode of the broadcast campaign. The example above was about a live delivered message. How about answer machine / voicemail campaigns?</p>
<p> For most industries, the response value for the live delivery &#8211; live transfer broadcast is between 0.6% and 1.0%. Which means that for every 100 calls delivered to a live answered phone, there is less than 1 transfer.</p>
<p> For a program that leaves messages on voicemail, the numbers will be a whole lot less, because the listener must have enough involvement to record the callback number, and finally dial it back, requiring much more work than simply &#8220;pressing 1&#8243; while listening to a live script. These results are impractical for us to track, since the calls back to the telemarketer don&#8217;t utilize our broadcast system, but telemarketers who use this method have confirmed to us that the call back ratio is often 1/4 to 1/3 of the live transfer ratio for a like pitch.</p>
<p> For a businessperson considering working with pre-recorded telemarketing as a lead producing system, the message is essential, the targetted list is essential, and the basic business systems are probably the most critical factor to consider when planning a <a target="_blank" href="http://www.livephoneleads.com">lead generation</a> program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wikijuana.co.uk/2008/10/what-results-to-consider-utilizing-automated-telemarketing-to-produce-leads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

